Asset-tracing engagements that look like questions about hidden wealth are usually questions about hidden documents. The asset is rarely well-concealed once you have the corporate genealogy that touches it; the corporate genealogy is the work.
That work is unglamorous. It is reading registries that are not always in English. It is reconciling transliteration variants of the same individual's name across Cyrillic, Latin, and Polish-diacritic forms. It is patiently mapping nominee directors against historical court filings. It is the sort of work that AI accelerates substantially, and that no AI does well without supervision.
For counsel running recoveries, the practical consequence is that the speed of the trace is upper-bounded less by tooling than by analyst discipline and source-language fluency. Both are scarce. We invest in both.
This is placeholder draft text intended to validate page templates and rendering. It will be replaced before publication.